Construction of houses with 3D printing technology

The idea of building houses with 3D cement printers has captured the imagination of many. The promise of faster, cheaper and more sustainable housing seems revolutionary. However, despite its potential, this business has not yet taken off as expected. What is this about?

One of the problems is the issue of regulations and permits to build, since construction with 3D printers requires new legal and regulatory frameworks. Permitting and approving projects can be slow and complex processes, discouraging investors and builders.

Furthermore, public perception is not very positive. There is some skepticism and mistrust towards 3D printed houses. Some perceive them as less durable, safe or aesthetic than houses built with traditional methods

And the issue of costs is not at all clear, because despite the promises of savings, 3D printing technology in concrete remains expensive. The price of printers, construction materials and specialized labor are not yet competitive with traditional methods. Although construction times are much faster.

But despite all the challenges ahead, the future of 3D printed houses can be interesting, because as time goes by the costs will decrease due to technological advances.

Not long ago I saw other information about a North American company called ICON that offers houses built in 3D, although I have not been able to find out their prices, but the company announces that it saves around $25,000 compared to conventional houses. It remains to be seen if this savings is enough to interest potential customers.

The appearance of the houses is good, and their construction is faster than normal, with the particularity that it is built with cement and not with wood like many North American houses.

A video can be viewed at: https://youtu.be/IRYjZed8ysM

And another one at: https://youtu.be/4bMTFr33el4

It is clear that to convince customers, technology must still innovate to reduce costs and improve the quality of construction. Without forgetting the raising of public awareness about the benefits of 3D printed houses, and finally the development of appropriate standards and legal frameworks.

There may be a lot of time left for that, but I think it’s worth it.